
As I think everyone knows, one of the nice features of this property is a beautiful pond below the house and dog yards. It's roughly 100' x 100' in size (30 m x 30 m), is spring fed, and water circulates from the spring, through the pond and out through a pipe even in winter. That constant flow, of course, means it doesn't freeze solid. We know that many years ago there used to be fish in this pond, but there aren't any longer -- we're not sure whether it was from overfishing or natural causes. We'd like to stock it with fish again, both for ourselves and for the cats (well, and as an occasional treat for some lucky dogs, too!).
So we've been in touch with a local company that does pond stocking and consulting to find out how many fish the pond can support, which types, etc. Their recommendation is for one of three types of trout -- brook, rainbow, or brown. Which one is best depends on the flow and temperature of the water in the summer. But the first and most important question they asked was, how deep is the pond? They wanted it at least 10 feet (.9 m) at its deepest point. They said a pond this size and that depth could hold approximately 130 to 150 trout.
Now, late July or August was no doubt a better time to explore this issue, but we were caught up with the move and unpacking and getting our feet solidly on the ground. Plus, I knew that ponds were typically stocked in spring or fall, so I figured we had some time to wade into this (so to speak).
As it was, one thing led to another, and finally, here we were in December with the question still unanswered. No time like December to find out how deep a pond is, eh?
Our employee Kate was kind enough to offer up her family's canoe for the project, and on Thursday after lunch we carried it down to the pond. After much discussion about who would actually go in the canoe, it was obvious that this job was going to be mine. Since I hadn't been in a canoe in 30 years, Alayne brought along the camera to chronicle any mishaps, which she was sure were bound to happen.
In her mind were these blog photos:
- See Steve capsize.
- See Steve swim to shore.
- See Kate pull Steve out of the water.
I'm truly not making up the extent of her concern about this. She actually insisted on tying a rope to the canoe "just in case." Kate seemed to agree that this was a really good idea. I told them this was embarrassing and that if I could, I'd Photoshop it out of the photos. Alas, here's my "training rope":

I said, "What, you don't think I can make it to shore on a pond this size? You think I might get lost out there?"
"Oh, I just think it's good insurance," she kept saying in response. Kate continued to nod in silent agreement. I think she was just afraid she'd never see her canoe again.
In fact, It was never really clear to me whether the rope was to help save me, or actually the canoe, in case of capsizing. Alayne was always a bit vague on that point.
In any case, I climbed in, wobbled back and forth a few times trying to find my balance, Kate pushed the canoe off the shore, and I began paddling. "Going in circles" is probably the kindest way to describe my first few minutes afloat. But finally I got where I wanted to go, roughly in the center of the pond, and then dropped our sophisticated, scientific "marine depth measuring system," or MDMS, overboard -- otherwise known as a ratchet strap with a heavy hook on the end.
Here I am looking at the data this system yielded, i.e., where the water line was on the strap once the hook rested on the bottom:

With data captured, I headed back to shore ... though I wasn't certain whether I was actually under my own power ... or gently and surreptitiously being pulled back to shore by Kate with the rope.
Here she is doing a "happy dance" that I made it safely back to shore and didn't sink her family's canoe during the excursion:

Okay, in truth I think she was climbing over some brush, but I'm sure she was doing a "virtual" happy dance in her mind that the canoe wasn't resting on the bottom of Rolling Dog Pond.
I handed the high-tech MDMS device to Alayne, showed her the data point, and off she went to measure it. The answer: 10 feet 4 inches.
I can't wait to see the barn cats line up on shore in the spring as 100+ trout are released into the pond!
---

Still 2nd place -- but it's too close for comfort! Contest ends December 19th!
Please keep voting for the sanctuary in the Shelter Challenge -- the votes are adding up! And remember, you can vote every day, so consider bookmarking the voting page to make it easy.
You can vote in the Shelter Challenge here.
Please note: Use Rolling Dog Ranch for our name and NH for the state and our listing will come up.
It was thanks to all of your amazing votes that we won the $20,000 Grand Prize in the final Shelter Challenge of 2009, and we came in fourth nationwide in the first Shelter Challenge earlier this year, winning $3,000. So this is serious money and can really make a difference for our disabled animals! Please help us win this round of the contest by voting every day, and by encouraging your family, friends and colleagues to vote every day, too. Thank you!